The Princess is a family car that was produced in the United Kingdom by British Leyland from 1975 until 1981. The car inherited a front-wheel drive / transverse engine configuration from its predecessor, the BMC ADO17 range. This was still unusual in Europe for full-sized family cars and gave the Princess a cabin space advantage when compared with similarly sized cars from competing manufacturers.
The car, which was given the design code ADO71,[1] was originally marketed as the Austin / Morris / Wolseley 18–22 series. In 1975 the range was renamed "Princess". This was a new marque created by British Leyland [2] although it had previously been used as a model name on the Austin Princess limousine from 1947 to 1956.[3] The Princess is often referred to as the Austin Princess, but this name was not used in the home (UK) market. It was, however, used in New Zealand. The car later appeared in revamped form as the Austin Ambassador, which was produced from 1982 until 1984 and only ever sold in Britain.
Princess sales, although strong for the 1976 model year, tailed off more quickly than forecast, primarily because of quality and reliability issues. Also by 1977 many of its competitors had gained a versatile fifth door which the Princess lacked, and the medium large-car sector fell victim to a poor economic climate further compounded by the OPEC oil crisis of the day. Total production amounted to 224,942 units.
Contents |
Manufacturer | British Leyland |
---|---|
Also called | Austin & Morris, 1800 & 2200 |
Production | 1975–76 |
Predecessor | Austin 1800 and 2200 |
Successor | Princess |
Class | fullsize car |
Body style | 4-door saloon |
Engine | 1.8 L B-Series pushrod straight-4 2.2 L E-series SOHC straight-6 |
Transmission | 4-speed manual all-synchromesh[4] 3-speed automatic |
Wheelbase | 105 in (2,667 mm)[4] |
Length | 175.41 in (4,455 mm)[4] |
Width | 68.11 in (1,730 mm)[4] |
Height | 55.48 in (1,409 mm) [4] |
Designer | Harris Mann |
Manufacturer | British Leyland |
---|---|
Production | 1975–76 |
Predecessor | Wolseley 18/85 and Six |
Successor | Princess |
Class | fullsize car |
Body style | 4-door saloon |
Engine | 2.2 L E-series SOHC straight-6 |
Wheelbase | 105 in (2,667 mm)[4] |
Length | 175.41 in (4,455 mm)[4] |
Width | 68.11 in (1,730 mm)[4] |
Height | 55.48 in (1,409 mm) [4] |
Designer | Harris Mann |
The car was launched to critical acclaim on 26 March 1975 as the 18–22 Series, "the car that has got it all together". The number designation 18–22 referred to the engine sizes available carried forward from the 1800 cc and 2200 cc BMC B-series-engined BMC ADO 17 "Landcrab". For the first six months of production three badge-engineered versions were produced: Austin, Morris and Wolseley. The Austin model bore the original "design intent", featuring trapezoidal headlights and a simple horizontally-vaned grille. The Morris and Wolseley cars had a raised "hump" permitting a larger, styled grille for each model; the Morris one was a simple chrome rectangle with Morris in the lower right-hand corner, while Wolseleys had a chrome grille with the traditional illuminated company logo, with narrower vertical bars either side set back within the chromed surround. Both of these versions had four round headlights, and the Wolseley model was only available with the six-cylinder engine and luxury velour trim. Apart from their bonnet and headlamp designs, and of course their badging, the Austin and Morris models were virtually identical.
Models | Years | Engine Types | Transmissions |
---|---|---|---|
Austin 1800 | March 1975–September 1975 | 4-cyl 1798 cc B Series | 4-speed Manual 3-speed Automatic |
Austin 1800 HL | March 1975–September 1975 | 4-cyl 1798 cc B Series | 4-speed Manual 3-speed Automatic |
Austin 2200 HL | March 1975–September 1975 | 6-cyl 2226 cc E Series | 4-speed Manual 3-speed Automatic |
Morris 1800 | March 1975–September 1975 | 4-cyl 1798 cc B Series | 4-speed Manual 3-speed Automatic |
Morris 1800 HL | March 1975–September 1975 | 4-cyl 1798 cc B Series | 4-speed Manual 3-speed Automatic |
Morris 2200 HL | March 1975–September 1975 | 6-cyl 2226 cc E Series | 4-speed Manual 3-speed Automatic |
Wolseley | March 1975–September 1975 | 6-cyl 2226 cc E Series | 4-speed Manual 3-speed Automatic |
Like many other controversial cars, the exterior styling was distinctive, innovative, and somewhat divisive. "The Wedge", as it was often nicknamed, was indeed very wedge-shaped; the styling was all angles and slanting panels. This was in very much 1970s style as created by Italian stylists (see Lamborghini Countach for the production epitome of such style). Within BL the car was often referred to as "The Anteater". The designer, Harris Mann, was also responsible for the Triumph TR7, another notably wedge-shaped car, as was his original design for the Austin Allegro, although by the time that design had been readied for production nearly all the angular styling features had been lost.
The Princess, unlike the Allegro, made it to production metal relatively unscathed and unaltered from Harris's original plan. The bonnet (hood) was a little higher, to allow for taller engines, but the biggest change from Harris's design involved the rear. Harris had intended the design to be a five-door hatchback, but management decided that the Austin Maxi should be the only hatchback in the range, making that its unique selling point, and besides, they thought the Princess's prospective buyers would not like a hatchback – despite the fact that in the Rover division the new Rover SD1 was being given a hatchback design. Consequently, the Princess received fixed rear glass and a separate boot, belying its appearance. Some feel this was to prove a sales-loser for the Princess's entire life.
An estate version was also proposed, but never reached production.
Interestingly, for a car that was distinctive (particularly in its body lines), it was actually a popular car with professional car converters, namely Crayford Engineering, Torcars (who both did conversions of the car to hatchback form – sold confusingly as "Princess Estate") and Woodall-Nicholson – who built stretched limousine and hearse variants.
The base engine fitted was the 1800 cc B-Series pushrod straight-4. The lay-out closely followed that of the predecessor model, but access to the alternator/water pump was greatly improved by exploiting the car's longer nose to fit a front-mounted radiator.[5] The basic design of the engine dated back to 1947 and the unit with a claimed output of 84 bhp[5] was notably lacking in power, although torque was reasonable. The larger engine, fitted to upper models in the range, was a 2200 cc E-series SOHC straight-6. This was very smooth and a much more modern engine, with a published output figure of 110 bhp,[5] but was still not hugely powerful. The Princess was a big car, and the engine choice gave lacklustre performance, not helped by the provision of only a 4-speed manual gearbox (a Borg-Warner automatic transmission was an option, but performance with this was by all accounts positively lethargic). A 5-speed gearbox might have improved top end speed, economy and NVH: alas BL funds never stretched this far in development.
Suspension used BL's Hydragas system, and was very soft and smooth; the intention was to offer as smooth a ride as the Citroën CX and this was almost achieved. The Princess's ride was excellent, and comfort in general was a selling point; the car was roomy, reasonably well-appointed for the time, the seating was comfortable, and overall the driving experience – provided you didn't care that much about performance – was excellent.
A six-cylinder car was road tested by Britain's Autocar magazine in March 1975 at the time of the model's launch. It recorded a maximum speed of 104 mph (167 km/h) and reached 60 mph (97 km/h) from a standing start in 13.5 seconds.[4] The top speed was marginally lower than the 109 mph (175 km/h) achieved by a recently tested Ford Consul 2500 L and a full three seconds slower to 60 mph than the Ford which managed the standing start test in just 10.4 seconds. The 2200 also fell slightly behind the Fiat 132GLS 1800 in these comparisons.[4] At the same time its overall fuel consumption at 20.7 mpg was usefully superior to the Ford's 18.1 mpg.[4] The lighter Fiat was more frugal with fuel than either of the other two.[4] On price, the Austin's domestic market recommended retail prices including taxes of £2,424 was significantly higher than the £2,221 charged for the Ford.[4]
Although its performance figures on paper were a little underwhelming, the testers were impressed with the roominess and roadholding of the Austin 2200.[4] They found it quiet and comfortable, the driving position in particular representing a vast improvement over the car's predecessor.[4] They mentioned in passing that the boot/trunk on the test car "leaked slightly", but did not labour the point.[4]
Manufacturer | British Leyland |
---|---|
Production | 1976–77 |
Predecessor | Austin 18-22 Morris 18-22 Wolseley 2200 |
Successor | Princess 2 |
Class | fullsize car |
Body style | 4-door saloon |
Engine | 1.8 L B-Series pushrod straight-4 2.2 L E-series SOHC straight-6 |
By September 1975, the process of unifying Austin and Morris dealerships was advanced sufficiently, while the Wolseley marque was to be abandoned. Thus the policy of selling seven 18–22 series models under three different marques was changed and the range was reduced to four models all sold under the Princess name. A crown badge was affixed to the point of the bonnet and the script word "Princess" was affixed to the grille, the thick vinyl-clad C-pillars and the boot. Only the 1800 cc model bore the twin headlights, with the 2200 cc models sporting the wedge-shaped headlights Harris Mann had designed the car to be seen with.
Build quality of the Princess was affected by poor quality control and constant industrial disputes; it gained a reputation for unreliability it could never shake off, even though quality improved in later years. The styling, praised upon introduction, was soon labelled "ugly". To quote a phrase in Parker's Car Price Guide from the 1990s, "an early critic suggested that the people responsible for designing the front and rear of the car were not speaking to one another".
Models | Years | Engine Types | Transmissions |
---|---|---|---|
Princess 1800 | September 1975–July 1978 | 4-cyl 1798 cc B Series | 4-speed Manual 3-speed Automatic |
Princess 1800 HL | September 1975–July 1978 | 4-cyl 1798 cc B Series | 4-speed Manual 3-speed Automatic |
Princess 2200 HL | September 1975–July 1978 | 6-cyl 2226 cc E Series | 4-speed Manual 3-speed Automatic |
Princess 2200 HLS | September 1975–July 1978 | 6-cyl 2226 cc E Series | 4-speed Manual 3-speed Automatic |
Manufacturer | British Leyland |
---|---|
Production | 1977–81 |
Predecessor | Princess |
Successor | Austin Ambassador |
Class | fullsize car |
Body style | 4-door saloon |
Engine | 1.7 L O-Series SOHC straight-4 2.0 L O-Series SOHC straight-4 2.2 L E-series SOHC straight-6 |
In July 1978, the Princess was given a revamp and renamed the Princess 2. The main change was the replacement of the old 1800 cc B-Series engine with the new O-Series engine. The new engine was offered in two sizes: 1695 cc and 1993 cc. Since there was an 1800 cc tax barrier for company cars at the time, the 1700 cc O-Series engine was developed to take advantage of that, whilst the 2000 cc engine was developed for the private motorists who wanted something different from the popular Ford Cortina. The car had perhaps reached its pinnacle when the prestigious Motoring Which publication described the Princess 2200HLS automatic model as "An excellent car, marred only by poor reliability".
Production of the Princess ceased in November 1981.
The basic Princess design lived on in revised form until 1984 as the Austin Ambassador.[6]
Models | Years | Engine Types | Transmissions |
---|---|---|---|
Princess 2 1700 L | July 1978–November 1981 | 4-cyl 1695 cc O Series | 4-speed Manual 3-speed Automatic |
Princess 2 1700 HL | July 1978–November 1981 | 4-cyl 1695 cc O Series | 4-speed Manual 3-speed Automatic |
Princess 2 1700 HLS | May 1979–March 1980 | 4-cyl 1695 cc O Series | 4-speed Manual 3-speed Automatic |
Princess 2 2000 HL | July 1978–November 1981 | 4-cyl 1993 cc O Series | 4-speed Manual 3-speed Automatic |
Princess 2 2000 HLS | May 1979–November 1981 | 4-cyl 1993 cc O Series | 4-speed Manual 3-speed Automatic |
Princess 2 2200 HL | July 1978–January 1979 | 6-cyl 2226 cc E Series | 4-speed Manual 3-speed Automatic |
Princess 2 2200 HLS | July 1978–November 1981 | 6-cyl 2226 cc E Series | 4-speed Manual 3-speed Automatic |
In New Zealand the car was officially sold as the Austin Princess. Assembled in the New Zealand Motor Corporation's plant in Nelson, it was introduced to the market in 1977 and utilized the Austin 1800 B-series engine.
In early 1979 the car was re-engined with the BL O-Series OHC motor. Due to a conflict of the Austin Princess and Morris Marina competing in the same market sector in New Zealand, the Princess got a 2.0 L unit mounted transversely, while the Marina (which was face-lifted at that time and renamed in NZ as "Morris 1.7") received the 1.7 L unit mounted longitudinally.
Being competitively priced, the Princess proved a popular car on the New Zealand market, and proved to be a good alternative to the rear-wheel-drive Ford Cortina, Mitsubishi Sigma and Holden Commodore ranges.
Local production of the car ended in June 1982, when the completely knocked-down kits of the car had been used up. The Austin Princess R, the last model sold there, was still on new-car price lists in 1983, and was available only in black to commemorate the end of local assembly of a long line of Austin cars.
The Princess designer Harris Mann intended it to be a hatchback and Torcars created a conversion designed to meet the growing demand for fifth-door saloons which was dealer approved. The Torcars Princess Estate was available in 1800 or 2200 engine sizes, with manual or automatic gearboxes.
The original sleek wedge profile was completely retained but the tailgate revealed an enormous loadspace accessible by probably the largest estate car aperture available on any European car at the time. With the rear seat lowered there is a load length of nearly 6 feet (1.8 m), a load width averaging 4 feet (1.2 m), a load height of nearly 3 feet (0.91 m), and an overall carrying capacity of 54 cubic feet (assuming Dunlop Denovo run-flat wheels and tyres are fitted, obviating the need for a spare wheel).
Also included as standard items not available on the standard Princess were a wash-wipe system for the rear screen is fitted and a fully carpeted luggage area.
Few Princesses are left in roadworthy condition. By the 1980s the Princess was outdated and practically valueless; most went to the breakers yard or were dismantled for parts. Displacers for the Hydragas suspension system are now no longer manufactured, meaning that Princesses (and Austin Ambassadors) still on the road face a dwindling supply of this essential component.
A Princess was owned by Terry and June Medford, in the BBC sitcom of the same name. Similarly Bobby and Sheila Grant drove a blue Princess in Brookside, until the starting was remodelled in the 1990s, their car could be seen throughout the opening credits and was visible on the title-card.
A Bronze Metallic coloured (BMC/BL colour code: BLVC 370)Princess was used by KGB agents in the TV series The Professionals. The episode in question was titled "Stopover" and it was episode 3 of the third series, first broadcast on 10 November 1979.
The character "Lomper" (actor Steve Huison) attempts suicide in a Princess in the film The Full Monty .
More recently, fictional character Dirk Gently owns an Austin Princess, which played an important role in the 2010 television adaptation of Douglas Adams' novel Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency. Top Gear tested the Princess against the Dolomite Sprint and a Rover SD1, declaring it to be the best car British Leyland made (from the 3 cars selected) after it had performed the best in in some very unconventional tests. Also on Top Gear the car was shown to Jay Kay for his comments on the vehicle, he selected only a minor part of the trim as having any design merit and demonstrated the poor design of the engine bay by standing in the space left next to the engine.
|